Soares v. Stop & Shop Companies
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff obtained a verdict for injuries resulting from a slip and fall on premises controlled by the defendant, and the defendant appealed from the ensuing judgment and the denial of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. 1. The defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was waived, and its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict properly denied, because of the defendant’s failure to renew its motion for a directed verdict at the close of its own case. Martin v. Hall, 369 Mass. 882, 884 (1976). Mass.R.Civ.P. 50(b), 365 Mass. 814 (1974). The case…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- LaClair v. Silberline Manufacturing Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Michnik-Zilberman v. Gordon's Liquor, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- National Bank of Commerce v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Martin v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Collins's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. LeinbachMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990