Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hall

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 8, 1976PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

This is an action of tort in which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained as a result of the defendant’s negligence. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant moved for a directed verdict, which motion was denied by the judge. The record does not establish that the defendant renewed his motion after putting on his case. At the close of all the evidence, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The sole question on appeal is whether the trial judge improperly denied the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.

The evidence, as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bogk v. GassertSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Kattar v. DemoulasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Michnik-Zilberman v. Gordon's Liquor, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Deerskin Trading Post, Inc. v. Spencer Press, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API