Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Farrion

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 7, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARGULIES, J.S.C.

No New Jersey court has decided whether the New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Association (N.J.A.F.I.U.A.) or the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund (U.C.J.F.) is primarily liable for Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage for a pedestrian injured by a stolen car. The matter is before the court on cross-motion for summary judgment by plaintiff and N.J.A.F.I.U.A.

Absent compelling cause, this court will adhere to precedent set by a coordinate branch of the judicial system even though it may not be binding or obligatory authority. In a society which is highly…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Douglas v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Amiano v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Dixon v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Wormack v. HowardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. Fisher v. New Jersey Auto. Full Ins. Underwriting Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campbell v. New Jersey Auto. Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  2. Jackson v. FarrionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API