Legal Opinion

Kinne v. Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1928No. Docket No. 98PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

(after stating the facts). This court has quite consistently held that mutual insurance companies such as defendant insure only their members, and that membership in such companies may not be obtained by estoppel, the latest speaking of the court being in the case of Crank v. Insurance Co., 239 Mich. 642. But plaintiffs do not claim to be members by estoppel. They claim to be members by reason of the provisions of section 14. They claim that from the death of their ancestor they have continued to pay all assessments levied pursuant to section 19 of the charter, none of which were tendered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hascall v. CoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Crank v. State Mutual Rodded Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edward A. Engel and Helen Engel v. United States of America and the People of the State of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  2. Engel v. State Mutual Rodded Fire Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Equitable Trust Co. v. Eastern Michigan Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API