Legal Opinion

Hascall v. Cox

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1882PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. Appeal from allowance of the account of the executrix. Contestant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This is an appeal by Nancy Cox, one of the distributees under the will of Yolney Hascall, from the allowance of the account of Sophia B. Hascall, executrix, and the final order of distribution.

The will of Yolney Hascall bears date January 14, 1873, and is as follows :

“I, Yolney Hascall, aged fifty-three years, of Kalamazoo in the State of Michigan, being of sound mind, make and declare this my last will and testament: First. I give and bequeath to my wife Sophie, our homestead in Kalamazoo, with all my pictures, books, furniture, musical instruments, and clothing; also my house and lot in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eisman v. PoindexterIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Thurston v. AllenHawaii Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Johnson v. Knights of HonorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
  3. Michigan Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. RolfeMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. In Re Churchill's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Turner v. BurrMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API