Wood v. State

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the sale of methamphetamine. The jury assessed the punishment at three years.

Appellant contends that entrapment was shown as a matter of law and that the court should have charged on entrapment. He also contends that the court should have charged that the failure to call a possible witness created a presumption favorable to appellant and unfavorable to the State. Complaint is made that “have you heard” questions propounded to appellant’s witnesses were improper. He claims error in the testimony of the probation officer. Lastly, he…