Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided July 9, 1947No. Civil Action No. 5901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNNE, District Judge.

This is a proceeding under the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended, particularly under Section 8(e), 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 308(e). On July 1, 1947, this cause came on to be tried before the Court without a jury. From the evidence introduced by both the petitioner and the respondent in said trial and from the exhibits on file in said case, the Court finds as follows:

Findings of Fact.

1. Petitioner is a resident of Alabama and resides at Powderly, Alabama.

2. Respondent is a corporation, and maintains a place of business at Birmingham, Alabama.

3.…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Helton v. Mercury Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Saleck v. Great Northern Railway Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1967
  3. Lipscomb v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co. v. LipscombCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. Flynn v. Ward Leonard Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  5. Delaney v. Special Service Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API