Commonwealth v. Rivers
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY, Justice.
On March 15, 1989 a jury convicted appellant of murder in the first degree, robbery and possession of an instrument of crime. 1 The following day the same jury found sufficient evidence to establish two aggravating circumstances and no evidence of any mitigating circumstances. The penalty was fixed by the jury at death. This is a direct appeal from the judgment of the sentence of death.
As appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence upon which her conviction of murder in the first degree is founded, we will begin our review with that issue. 2 In…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. FreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. LaCavaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. EichingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.