Legal Opinion

Leeds & Northrup Co. v. Interkiln-Salgo Engineering Co.

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided May 6, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 2592PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, J.

Agreed statement of facts:

1. Plaintiff and respondent furnished materials used in construction project on premises of owner, Port Costa Brick Works. Defendant and appellant (Surety Co.) issued a surety bond on behalf of general contractor which inures to the benefit of owner and all persons entitled to its protection under the mechanics’ lien laws of California.

2. The bond was filed for record in the proper county prior to the completion of the work. (Bond filed by owner, Port Costa Brick Works.)

3. The project was completed and a proper notice of completion was filed on September 6, 1957,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Tyler v. J. I. Mitrovich Bldg. Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ConternoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API