People v. Conterno
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817 (1959)
THE PEOPLE, Respondent,
v.
DOMENIC CONTERNO, Appellant.
California Court of Appeals.
Apr. 30, 1959.
Morris Lavine for Appellant.
Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney (Los Angeles), Philip E. Grey, Assistant City Attorney, and William E. Doran, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.
DAVID, J.
The jury's verdict declared defendant Conterno guilty of violation of California Vehicle Code, section 502: "It is unlawful for any person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor to drive a vehicle upon any highway ..."; and upon a second count of the complaint, found that he was…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.