Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Clark

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 3, 1986No. 1419Published

1DissentLipez, Judge

I agree with the majority’s disposition of all issues except *374defendant’s claim that he should be discharged for escape.1 While the county sheriff filed a criminal complaint against defendant for the crime of escape, the district attorney never filed an information formally charging defendant with that crime. This would clearly seem to require defendant’s discharge on his escape conviction, because as Chief Justice Maxey observed in a unanimous opinion for our Supreme Court:

No authority is needed to sustain the proposition that a defendant cannot be legally convicted of a crime neither charged…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Commonwealth v. LittleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. BoernerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API