Legal Opinion
Blythe v. Cordingly
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1905No. 2413Published
Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
The complaint named “Alfred Cordingly and Abraham Goodstein, late copartners under the firm name of Cordingly & Goodstein,” as defendants.
It alleged eight canses of action. The first seven were based npon promissory notes alleged to have been made by the defendants “under their firm name of Cordingly & Goodstein.”
The eighth canse of action alleged the execntion by “the firm of Cordingly & Goodstein” of six promissory notes identical in terms with those alleged in the first six canses of action; that snch promissory notes were endorsed by their respective payees to Fannie Goodstein and Millie…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sessions v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Exchange Bank v. FordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- Craig v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Jansen v. GrimshawIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Dessauer v. KoppinColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.