Legal Opinion

Canal Insurance v. a & R Transportation & Warehouse, LLC

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 6, 2005No. 1-04-0881PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoffman

The plaintiff, Canal Insurance (Canal), filed the instant action seeking a judicial declaration that it is not obligated to defend its insured, A&R Transportation and Warehouse, LLC (A&R), in a tort action brought against A&R by Kenneth Boyd or to indemnify A&R from any judgment that might he entered against it in that action. Canal and Boyd filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Canal and denied Boyd’s motion. Boyd filed a timely notice of appeal. A&R has not appealed from the trial court’s ruling and is not a party to this appeal. For…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Crum & Forster Managers Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Carruthers v. B. C. Christopher & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Murphy v. UrsoIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Allen v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. American Service Insurance v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. Argonaut Midwest Insurance Company v. MoralesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  3. Pekin Insurance Company v. Equilon Enterprises LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. Chicago Transit Authority v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Coleman v. B-H Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API