Binschus v. Department of Corrections
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[As amended by order of the Supreme Court January 17, 2017.]
Owens, J.
¶1 In 1992, we held that the State could be held liable for crimes committed by parolees if those crimes resulted from the State’s negligence in supervising the parolees. Taggart v. State, 118 Wn.2d 195, 822 P.2d 243 (1992). Today, plaintiffs ask us to extend Taggart and hold that a county jail can be held liable for crimes committed by a former inmate. However, the crimes in this case occurred well after the inmate left that jail—long after the county had the duty (or ability) to supervise the former inmate. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Volk v. DeMeerleerWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Harper v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Brown v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Amended July 3, 2017 Estate of Mercedes Gottschalk by Coexecutors Richard Gottschalk and Rebecca Rassler v. Pomeroy Development, Inc. D/B/A Pomeroy Care Center v. State of Iowa, Third-Party On Review FromSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Anderson v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.