Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Nickel

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 12, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

The defendant in error instituted an action by notice of motion against the plaintiff in error for damages arising out of a collision between a passenger train which was being operated by the plaintiff in error and a Chevrolet truck, which was being operated by the defendant in error. The collision occurred while the truck was “stalled” on a private crossing on the tracks of the plaintiff in error and it resulted in the complete destruction of the truck.

There were two trials of the case in the court below. The first trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in error. The trial court for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. P. Lorillard Co. v. ClaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. Hogg v. PlantSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. Clark v. HugoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  4. Peninsula Produce Exchange, Inc. v. UpshurCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brann v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1943
  2. Keeler v. BaumgardnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  3. Yorke v. MaynardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  4. Harris v. RoyerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  5. Wright v. PerrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API