Legal Opinion
Durham v. Roberts
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 6, 1996No. 95-35559Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
103 F.3d 138
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
David Raymond DURHAM, Richard Ervin Phelps, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Barbara ROBERTS, Governor of State of Oregon; James
Muranaka, Assistant Superintendent Program Services at
Oregon State Correctional Institution; Patrick Tacy,
Academic Manager Oregon State Correctional Institution;
Kelly Lawrence, Librarian Oregon State…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lee Max Barnett v. Helen Centoni, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison S. Donahue, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.