Love v. North American Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; Walter H. Sanborn, Judge. Suit by the North American Company against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, in which a receiver of the railroad company was appointed, and in which J. E. Love and others, constituting the Corporation Commission of the state of Oklahoma, and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company intervened.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; Walter H. Sanborn, Judge. Suit by the North American Company against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, in which a receiver of the railroad company was appointed, and in which J. E. Love and others, constituting the Corporation Commission of the state of Oklahoma, and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company intervened. From a judgment allowing the claims of the interveners, but denying them a preference, the interveners appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition in intervention filed June 14, 1914, wherein the Corporation Commission of the state of Oklahoma and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company pray that the sum of $88,751.86 be declared to be entitled to preferential payment as against the claims of the bondholders and other general creditors of the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, hereafter called the Frisco Company. The claims of interveners were allowed by the District Court, hut denied a preference.
The facts conditioning the preferential character of the claims are as follows: On…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. DoudCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Chicago & A. R. Co. v. United States & Mexican Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Rodger Ballast Car Co. v. Omaha, K. C. & E. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Whiteley v. Central Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Fordyce v. Omaha, Kansas City & E. R. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Berthold-Jennings Lumber Co. v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Spiller v. St. Louis & S. F. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- North American Co. v. St. Louis &. S. F. R.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1922
- Crane Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Fletcher Paper Co. v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.