People v. Centeno
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
Courts have repeatedly cautioned prosecutors against using diagrams or visual aids to elucidate the concept of proof beyond a reasonable doubt (see, e.g., People v. Medina (1995) 11 Cal.4th 694, 744-745 [47 Cal.Rptr.2d 165, 906 P.2d 2] (Medina); People v. Otero (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 865, 874 [148 Cal.Rptr.3d 812] (Otero); People v. Katzenberger (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 1260, 1269 [101 Cal.Rptr.3d 122] (Katzenberger)), yet these arguments persist. Here, the prosecutor used a diagram showing the boundaries of California and urged the jury to convict based on a “reasonable”…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by185 opinions
- People v. RangelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. Romero and SelfCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. WinbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. Daveggio & MichaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. PottsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.