Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Allen v. County of Wayne

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 2013Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING and DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

I concur in the majority’s resolution of the improper maintenance issue. However, I strongly disagree with the majority’s resolution of the immunity issue. As I would affirm on this issue, I dissent in part.

Here, Appellant/Plaintiff is an inmate of the Wayne County Correctional Facility. He was injured by another inmate while both were performing yard work. He sued the County under the theory that the other inmate was a negligent County “employee” as that term is defined in Section 8501 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8501, part of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mark D. Tourscher v. Martin Horn, Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Corrections John McCullough Superintendent ,(d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00176j)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. SMALICH v. WestfallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Malt Beverages Distributors Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Kline v. Arden H. Verner Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. KILEY BY KILEY v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API