Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brown v. Allen

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 9, 1953No. 32Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Jackson

Controversy as to the undiscriminating use of the writ of habeas corpus by federal judges to set aside state court convictions is traceable to three principal causes: (1) this Court’s use of the generality of the Fourteenth Amendment to subject state courts to increasing federal control, especially in the criminal law field; (2) ad hoc determination of due process of law issues by personal notions of justice instead of by known rules of law; and (3) the breakdown of procedural safeguards against abuse of the writ.

1. In 1867, Congress authorized federal courts to issue writs of habeas corpus…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API