Legal Opinion
James E. Clatterbuck v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 26, 1959No. 1006_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
Order
Upon consideration of petitioner’s petition for rehearing in banc of his application for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, it is
Ordered by the court that the petition for rehearing in banc be, and it is hereby, denied.
Circuit Judge WILBUR K. MILLER would grant the petition for rehearing in banc.
Circuit Judge BAZELON would grant the petition for rehearing in banc and files a statement in relation thereto.
Circuit Judge WASHINGTON voted against a rehearing in banc and files a statement in relation thereto.
Statements of Circuit Judges Bazelon and Washington in Relation to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Thomas E. Blunt v. United States of America, Thomas E. Blunt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Charles W. Douglas v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. RueSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Bowles v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- James C. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Herbert T. O'Beirne v. Winfred Overholser, Superintendent, St. Elizabeths HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Samuel Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.