Legal Opinion

Harper v. Dog Town, Inc., 08 No 348 (12-16-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 2008No. 08 NO 348PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court, the parties' briefs, and their oral arguments before this court. Appellants, Dog Town, Inc., and Lee Crock, appeal the decision of the Noble County Court of Common Pleas that found Appellees, J.D. and Michelle Harper, owned rail-related material in a railbed running along property which adjoined the property of the parties; awarded damages to Appellees for the railbed material removed by Appellants; and made an award of attorney fees to Appellees. On appeal, Appellants argue that the trial court erred…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Watershed Mgt., L.L.C. v. NeffOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Schmucker v. KurzenbergerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Harmon v. HaehnOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. O'Neill v. TanoukhiOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Scipio v. Used Car Connection, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API