Legal Opinion

Ethel D. Parrish v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 9, 1966No. 19493PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

On this appeal complaint is made that the District Court, trying this automobile negligence case without a jury, erroneously limited its award of damages for personal injuries to $300. Having first found liability, the court then heard evidence with respect to damages. Its resulting findings were that appellant, while riding in a car driven by her husband, suffered injuries to her right shoulder and lacerations of her left arm when the car collided with another. These were the injuries in respect of which the $300 was allowed.

Appellant had sought to establish in addition, however, that her…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perry v. Capital Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
  2. Hamilan Corporation, T/a Manger-Hamilton Hotel v. Jeanni M. O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Waldon v. CovingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Williams v. BakerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Asuncion v. Columbia Hospital for WomenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Morgan v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Robert Kropinski v. World Plan Executive Council--UsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API