Legal Opinion

Smego v. Payne

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 12, 2017No. 13-2055PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Near the end of his jury trial on various § 1983 claims, Richard M. Smego was removed from the courtroom. Various law students who had been appointed to act as his counsel remained behind. The jury ultimately returned a verdict in favor of defendants, and one of the law students declined to poll the jury without consulting Smego. Smego now appeals, arguing that the district court committed reversible error in removing him from the courtroom, and that he is entitled to a new trial under our holding in Verser v. Barfield, 741 F.3d 734 (7th Cir. 2013), because he was…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arwa Chiropractic, P.C. v. Med-Care Diabetic & Medical SuCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. In re SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Arwa Chiropractic, P.C. v. Med-Care Diabetic & Medical SuCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. Harris v. City Of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Jacqueline M. Sterling v. Southlake Nautilus HealthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API