Legal Opinion

American Type Founders, Inc. v. Lanston Monotype Machine Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1942No. 1563PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

This action arises upon petition for declaratory judgment and incidental relief in accordance with the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act.1 The prayer of the petition is that the court declare terminated a contract entered into between the parties on December 1, 1925, and grant incidental relief in the form of damages. From the evidence I make the following special

*532Findings of Fact.

1. Plaintiff is a New Jersey corporation with its principal place of business in Elizabeth, New Jersey, and it is engaged in the business of designing and manufacturing type.

2. Respondent is a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rossmassler v. SpielbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Harris v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Goudy v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
  4. Bombolaski v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Green v. Indian Gold Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mayerson v. Washington Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Boulevard Airport, Inc. v. Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. American Type Founders, Inc. v. Lanston Monotype Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  4. Metal Associates, Inc. v. East Side Metal Spinning & Stamping Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API