Legal Opinion
Fox v. I-10, LTD.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 23, 1998No. 96SC483PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis
William Fox, individually, and as trustee for a pension plan and a profit sharing plan, (Fox) is a limited partner in I — 10 Ltd. (the Partnership or I — 10). Fox appeals a judgment of the court of appeals holding that the amendment provisions in the partnership agreement and applicable statutes allowed the limited partners to increase their capital contribution obligation by majority vote. Fox v. 1-10 Ltd., 936 P.2d 580 (Colo.App.1996). We granted certiorari to consider the propriety of this ruling, 1 and now conclude that the majority vote provision plainly allows amendment of the limited…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Klein v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- USI Properties East, Inc. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Rodriguez v. SchuttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Colorado Coffee Bean, LLC v. Peaberry Coffee Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Roberts v. AdamsColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- In RE ESTATE OF McCREATHColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Janicek v. Obsideo, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.