Legal Opinion
In re the Accounting of Weinberg
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided December 20, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Christopher C. McGrath, S.
A construction of the decedent’s will and codicil is necessary in this executor’s accounting. Testatrix left a last will and testament dated June 14, 1954 and a codicil dated October 27, 1955. The same attorney prepared both instruments which were duly admitted to probate on April 4, 1956.
The following are the pertinent provisions of the will and codicil concerning which construction is required: Paragraph “ fipth (d) ” of the will:
“(d) I give and bequeath to my daughter, ruth kamil, forty (40%) percent of my said residuary estate in trust nevertheless, in the manner…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of BuechnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Herzog v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Roseboom v. . RoseboomNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Tillman v. . OgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- In Re the Estate of GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Construction of the Last Will of OsherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977
- In re the Accounting of WeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958