Legal Opinion
Delaware-New Jersey Ferry Co. v. Leeds
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided July 11, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor:
The facts set forth in the foregoing statement are derived from the answer of Leeds, and in view of the motion for a decree notwithstanding his answer are to be taken as true.
The bill seeks an adjudication of title to the particular 716 shares of stock now registered in the name of Delaware Mortgage Investment Company. Neither defendant has filed a cross-bill seeking relief against the complainant in case title to the shares in question is adjudged to the other. Whether such a cross-bill would be proper, I am not called upon to decide. The question as shaped by the pleadings is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holbrook v. . New Jersey Zinc Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Ferris v. Chic-Mint Gum Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
- Royal Insurance Co. v. SimonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
- Lockwood v. BatesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1833
- State ex rel. Louisiana State Bank v. Bank of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Securities Transfer, Inc. v. Pantheon Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1994
- Blandin v. United North & South Development Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
- Continental Thrift v. Twinlock, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
- Blandin v. United North and South Development Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
- Continental Thrift v. Twinlock, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.