Legal Opinion
Ferris v. Chic-Mint Gum Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided May 23, 1924PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
Consideration of the rights of the mortgagee has drawn into the discussion the rights of other claimants, and all being before the court pressing their respective demands, directions will be herein given defining the rights and priorities of each.. No attempt will be made to ascertain the precise sums to be' paid to individual claimants. The principles by which distribution is to be made will be laid down. Thereafter an order applying those principles may bé submitted for signature.
The following are the claimants:(1) The receiver for expenses, allowances and costs of. the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. CurryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1912
- Central Trust & Savings Co. v. Chester County Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911
- Walter v. Peninsula Cut Stone Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1912
3Cited by26 opinions
- County of Spokane v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- State v. WynneTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- United States v. Beaver Run Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- National Surety Corp. v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Merryweather v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.