Legal Opinion

Baumer v. Franklin County Distilling Co.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided February 5, 1942No. 14PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SWINFORD, District Judge.

This is an action for an alleged breach of contract.

The defendant was a whiskey distilling corporation manufacturing among other brands of whiskey “K. Taylor” and “Belle of Franklin”. These two brands were the same whiskey bearing different labels.

The State of Ohio, with reference to its liquor dispensing policy, is what is known as a “monopoly” state. By this is meant that it sells directly to retailers as a wholesaler and no brands of whiskey are permitted to be sold in the State except from the store of the State itself. It is important therefore for distillers to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Allis v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. ECKINGTON AND SOLDIERS' HOME RAILWAY CO. v. McDEVITTSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Howard Supply Co. v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lovejoy v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API