Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Aetna Health Plans of California, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 1999No. E021505PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*649Opinion

RICHLI, J.

Aetna Health Plans of California, Inc., appeals from the denial of its motion to compel arbitration of claims arising from its alleged failure to provide timely cancer treatment to Donald Erickson under Aetna’s Medicare coverage plan. We conclude that: (1) although Aetna’s arbitration provision failed to comply with Health and Safety Code section 1363.1, that statute is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act; and (2) the arbitration provision is not otherwise invalid under general principles of law. Accordingly, we reverse.

I

Factual and Procedural Background

Aetna is a…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Marin Storage & Trucking, Inc. v. Benco Contracting & Engineering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Deveny v. ENTROPIN, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Malek v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Giullanoi v. Inland Empire Personnel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Warren-Guthrie v. Health NetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API