Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wells v. City of Charleston

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1922PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge:

The relator has applied for a writ of mandamus to compel respondents, the City of Charleston, its mayor and individual couneilmen,'.to act favorably upon two separate applications by him- for permits to operate motor vehicles for hire in said city; the first, as described in the petition, “to operate a five 'passenger Ford Touring Car, commonly known as and called a Jitney Bus. The same to be used for receiving, carrying and discharging passengers within the corporate limits of said city, for which a fee of ten cents is to be charged to each and every passenger;” the second, as-…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Emma B. C. Thompson v. Richard RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Mayor of Hagerstown v. Hagerstown Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  4. State ex rel. Wells v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Block v. CrockettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Charleston v. Southeastern Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Vector Co. v. BOARD OF ZON. APP., CITY OF MARTINSBURGWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. City of Charleston v. Southeastern Const. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. City of MorgantownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Freeman v. PollingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API