Legal Opinion

Clay, Robinson & Co. v. Martinez

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 2, 1923No. 10,317; No. 10,319; No. 10,320Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

2Per curiam

Upon motion for rehearing the plaintiffs and an amicus curiae ask us to modify our opinions in two respects:

First. They say that plaintiffs do not claim that their sheep were among those mortgaged; Second. They say that the sheep in question were not turned over to defendants, but were taken by them.

Our interpretation of the finding of the court was and is that the sheep were mortgaged, and were delivered to Clay, Robinson & Co. If they were either mortgaged or delivered, the judgments heretofore ordered by us to be entered were correct. If they were neither mortgaged nor…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baker v. CordwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  2. People ex rel. Clay, Robinson & Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Oligarchy Ditch Co. v. Farm Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. Walsh v. HastingsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API