Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Mayes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 8, 1959No. 17541PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Legge, Justice.

Respondent, a farmer, also operated a cotton gin and warehouse in the town of Mayesville. In September, 1957, he employed appellant, an electrician of some 25 years’ experience, to install a new lighting system around the gin and the warehouse. While cutting the old wires, appellant was seriously injured as the result of electric shock. He brought this action for damages, alleging that his injury had been caused by respondent’s negligence in lulling him into a sense, of security by telling him that these old wires had not been used for many years and carried no current.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bodie v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  2. Hall v. Northwestern R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  3. James v. Fountain Inn Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  4. Hice v. Dobson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  5. Barksdale v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davenport v. Cotton Hope Plantation Horizontal Property RegimeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Ben T. Honea v. West Virginia Pulp and Paper Company, a Corporation, and Jervis B. Webb Company of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  3. Canady v. Martschink Beer Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  4. Lawless v. FraserSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  5. Morgan v. RoperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API