United States v. Rogers
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CONNER, District Judge.
Presently before the court are defendant’s motions to suppress evidence (Docs. 23, 30) and motion to suppress identification (Doc. 25). The court held an eviden-tiary hearing on defendant’s motions on April 9, 2007. (See Doc. 38.) The motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for disposition. For the reasons that follow, the motions will be denied.
I. Findings of Fact 1
On December 20, 2006, defendant, Trevino E. Rogers, was indicted by a grand jury. The indictment charges defendant with: (1) possessing cocaine base with the intent to distribute, and (2)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.