Legal Opinion

State ex rel. First Thought Gold Mines, Ltd. v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1916No. 13754PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court September 26, 1916, for a writ of mandamus to compel the superior court for Stevens county, Jackson, J., to enter a judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

This case is an aftermath of the case of First Thought Gold Mines v. Stevens County, 91 Wash. 437, 157 Pac. 1080, reference to which should be made for all material antecedent facts. When the remittitur went down, counsel for the appellant, relator here, prepared a judgment for an amount equal to an assessment at the established rate upon the values fixed by this court. The prosecuting attor*434ney objected to the form of the judgment in that it did not provide for interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum covering the period of delinquency. The court was of opinion that the judgment should…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. County of Redwood v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. United States Trust Co. v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. People ex rel. Johnson v. PeacockIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  5. First Thought Gold Mines, Ltd. v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jones v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Colby v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State Ex Rel. Sparling v. HitsmanMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Crutcher v. KoelnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API