Legal Opinion
State v. Blankenship
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 10, 2013No. SC 93084PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GEORGE W. DRAPER III, Judge.
Dennis Blankenship (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence entered after finding him guilty of one count of attempted use of a child in a sexual performance, section 568.080, RSMo 2000.1 Defendant claims a violation of his constitutional right to protected speech and challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. This Court has jurisdiction because the case involves the validity of a state statute. Mo. Const, art. V, sec. 3. There was no error. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.
Factual and Procedural Background
Viewed in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of the New York State Crime Victims BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hess v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Charles David Girardier IIIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. RaglandMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. SlocumMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. Alangcas.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015
- State of Missouri v. Markus SteedMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.