Legal Opinion

State v. Bellamy

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 18, 1983No. 8211SC1109PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

I

Both defendants contend that the trial court erred in granting the State’s motion for a joint trial. This contention is without merit. G.S. 15A-926 provides that charges against two or more defendants may be joined for trial when each of the defendants is charged with accountability for each offense. Both defendants in this case were charged with the same offenses. Furthermore, the State’s evidence against each defendant was the same. “Consolidation of cases for trial is generally proper when the offenses charged are of the same class and are so connected in time and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. CallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LicataMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. McCormickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. Thad T.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API