Legal Opinion

M.D. v. Reykdal

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 29, 2023No. 2:22-cv-01621Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 N.D., et al., CASE NO. 2:22-cv-01621-LK 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 12 v. AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR 13 CHRIS REYKDAL, et al., RECONSIDERATION 14 Defendants. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration, Dkt. No. 60, 17 of the Court’s Order denying Plaintiffs’ motion for provisional class certification and for a 18 preliminary injunction, Dkt. No. 58 (the “Order”).1 At the Court’s request, Defendants filed a 19 response to the motion for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API