Camp v. Camp
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
From a judgment nihil dicit in a suit for divorce by appellee Dewayne Camp, wherein intervenors who were the paternal grandparents of the Camp’s minor child sought and obtained custody, appellant/defendant timely moved for new trial. Hear ing thereon was beyond the time within which there is provided to be a “presentment” of such a motion for new trial. The trial court refused to permit introduction of evidence. The motion for new trial was overruled and appeal was brought to this court.
We affirm.
One question presented by the appeal is whether the trial court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- United Beef Producers, Inc. v. LookingbillTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Griffin v. DutyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Texas Livestock Marketing Ass'n v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gendebien v. GendebienCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- In the Interest of A.C.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004