Legal Opinion

Homer N. Archambault v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1955No. 5081PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICKETT, Circuit Judge.

The defendant was charged in a three-count information with dispensing mis-branded habit-forming drugs in unlabeled containers without a prescription contrary to the provisions of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 331, 333, and 353. The charge grew out of three different sales of sodium pentobarbital capsules which the defendant made to George E. McDonald, an inspector for the United States Food and Drug Administration. The case went to the jury on the evidence of the prosecution and a verdict of guilty was returned on all three counts. The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for ten…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. FainblattSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Vista Eyewear, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Russell W. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  3. United States v. Marvin Allen Eagleston, United States of America v. Bobby Joe FaubianCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. SnowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. E. M. "Mike" Riebold and Donald T. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API