Legal Opinion

Pahlan v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1899PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Ionia; Davis, J. Oase by Edward Pahlan against the Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Company for personal injuries. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

At Ovid station the defendant’s railroad •consists of three tracks, there being two sidings north of the main track. Upon the north side of the northernmost track there was a coal-bin, which was erected, some years before the occurrence giving rise to this action, by the Ovid Buggy Company, to receive coal shipped over the defendant’s road. At the time of the accident, the side of the bin next the track overhung 8 inches at a height of *2346 feet, according to the testimony of one of the plaintiff’s-witnesses, who said that he measured it. He testified that the distance between the top of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. Phillips & Colby Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Balhoff v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Anderson v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Johnson v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Bradburn v. Wabash RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Bauer v. American Car & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Clay v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Howe v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API