Legal Opinion

Lowery v. Lowery

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1932No. 7 Div. 143PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The answer to the question first assigned for error was answered in a manner not prejudicial to appellant, regardless of what might have been the legal effect of a different answer.

An issue in the case was whether the plaintiff as a distributee of the estate of S. C. Lowery agreed expressly or impliedly to abide by an instrument which purported to be his will, though not probated, and consented for defendant to receive and distribute the funds of the estate. Defendant was named as exeeu tor of the will, and without probating it proceeded to disburse the funds. It is also claimed that though…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Upchurch v. NorsworthySupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  2. Ritchey v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. East v. KarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Densler v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
  5. Ward v. BevillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hale v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Staples v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Bennett v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Arledge v. EllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  5. Johnston v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API