Legal Opinion

Shattuck v. Green

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 15, 1870PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Two actions of contract. The first action, by Shattuck against Green, was on a promissory note dated December 5. 1866, for $300 payable on demand with interest, given by Green to Shattuck in part payment for an undivided half of the furniture, fixtures and stock in trade of an eating house in East Boston, called a dining saloon. The answer set up a failure of the consideration for the note.

Read the full summary

Two actions of contract. The first action, by Shattuck against Green, was on a promissory note dated December 5. 1866, for $300 payable on demand with interest, given by Green to Shattuck in part payment for an undivided half of the furniture, fixtures and stock in trade of an eating house in East Boston, called a dining saloon. The answer set up a failure of the consideration for the note. The second action, by Green against Shattuck, was for breach of Shattuck’s alleged warranty of title to the property sold, and o recover the amount paid by Green therefor. At the trial of both actions…

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

It is a general rule of law in this country, that in a sale of chattels a warranty of title is implied, unless the circumstances are such as to give rise to a contrary presumption. 1 Smith Lead. Cas. (6th Am. ed.) 242. 1 Parsons on Contracts, (5th ed.) 576, and cases cited. If the vendor has either actual or constructive possession, and sells the chattels and not merely his interest in them, such sale is equivalent to an affirmation of title, and a warranty is implied. In Whitney v. Heywood, 6 Cush. 82, 86, Dewey, J., says, “ Possession here must be taken in its broadest sense,” and “ the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allen v. Berkshire Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  2. Boston & Albany Railroad v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Edgerton v. MichelsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Scaling v. KnollinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  5. Stratton v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API