Legal Opinion

Boston & Albany Railroad v. Richardson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 10, 1883PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.

This case, which is an action of contract with a count in tort, presents an important question, referred *474to, but not decided, in Machinists’ National Bank v. Field, 126 Mass. 345.

In January, 1876, Mrs. Pratt owned five shares of the stock of the Boston and Albany Railroad Company, and held a certificate running in her name. Her son forged her name to a blank power of attorney, printed upon the back of the certificate, and delivered it to one Field, a broker. Field sold the shares to the defendants, and delivered to them the certificate with the forged signature thereon. The defendants…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Litchfield v. HutchinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Baltzen v. . NicolayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Bartlett v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Pratt v. Taunton Copper Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  5. Mershon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Allen v. South Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Doherty v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Lutz v. Van Heynigen Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. First National Bank v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Dedham National Bank v. Everett National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API