Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Human Rights Commission
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
— This lawsuit stems from administrative complaints filed with the Washington State Human Rights Commission against the Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company claiming that Mutual had refused to issue a homeowners policy to a couple who owned their own home on the grounds that they were not married and had refused to issue a tenant homeowners policy to another couple for the same reason. The Commission investigated the complaints and made findings pursuant to RCW 49.60.240 that there was reasonable cause to believe that Mutual had committed marital status discrimination contrary to RCW…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Human Rights Commission v. Cheney School District No. 30Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- Ackerley Communications, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Brown v. Superior UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- State ex rel. New York Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Barnes v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Yakima v. International Ass'n of Fire FightersWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Standard Alaska Production Co. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Seattle Seahawks, Inc. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Moses Lake v. GRANT BOUNDARY REVIEW BD.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- City of Moses Lake v. Grant County Boundary Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001