Legal Opinion

Avis-Rent-A-Car System, Inc. v. Franklin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 28, 1975PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. In our opinion, the "lease agreement” is, in fact, a secured transaction within the meaning of article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Unlike a mere lease, the agreement in question is of an indefinite duration and, at its inception, passes all the risks and indicia of ownership of the vehicle to the defendant. Defendant not only insures against any loss to the plaintiff of its capitalized cost, but after 26 months, is entitled to any surplus funds if and when the car is sold. At the end of 56 months, the car would, at the option of the defendant, pass to her at no cost, since…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp. v. Atlas Shirt Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1971

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Spencer Jerome Tillery, Bankrupt. Bill Swad Leasing Company v. Henry A. Stikes, Sr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Security Trust Co. v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. In the Matter of Excello Press, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Metlife Capital Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Randolph v. Franklin Inv. Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Credit Car Leasing Corp. v. DeCresenzoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API