Legal Opinion

Beukhof v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 12, 1984No. C3-83-1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

This is an appeal from the entry of summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action brought by an injured pedestrian against his own insurance company for underinsured motorist benefits. The Hen-nepin County District Court entered summary judgment in favor of the insurance company after it determined that an accident involving only a motorcycle and a pedestrian was not a “motor vehicle accident,” and thus did not trigger coverage. We affirm.

FACTS

The facts in this case were stipulated by the parties. David Beukhof was struck by a motorcycle while running to catch a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. American Motorist Insurance Co. v. SarvelaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Gudvangen v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Feick Ex Rel. Feick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeVille v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Beukhof v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Beukhof v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API