Beukhof v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This is an appeal from the entry of summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action brought by an injured pedestrian against his own insurance company for underinsured motorist benefits. The Hen-nepin County District Court entered summary judgment in favor of the insurance company after it determined that an accident involving only a motorcycle and a pedestrian was not a “motor vehicle accident,” and thus did not trigger coverage. We affirm.
FACTS
The facts in this case were stipulated by the parties. David Beukhof was struck by a motorcycle while running to catch a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- American Motorist Insurance Co. v. SarvelaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Gudvangen v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Feick Ex Rel. Feick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- DeVille v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Beukhof v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Beukhof v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985