Legal Opinion

Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, a Banking Corporation v. Dr. Robert E. Martin

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 15, 1972No. 71-1339PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented by this case is whether the district court properly dismissed this action under Rule 19, Fed. R.Civ.P., which provides that an action may be dismissed if a person who cannot be joined is regarded as indispensable under the criteria set forth in the rule.

I

In December 1967, defendant Martin bought $20,630 worth of stock through his broker, Smith, Barney & Co., Morgan Guaranty Trust Company, plaintiff herein, acted for Smith, Barney in transferring the stock and collecting payment. The stock was delivered through Martin’s bank, Civic Center Bank, in Chicago. Payment was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Forman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Alonzo Wayne Taylor v. The Washington Terminal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Cleamtee Garner, Father and Next-Of-Kin of Edward Eugene Garner, a Deceased Minor v. Memphis Police Department City of Memphis, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. Stephen P. Turner v. J.V.D.B. & Associates, Inc., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Alan L. Baldwin and George Q. Cannon, Jr. v. Redwood City, Alan L. Baldwin and George Q. Cannon, Jr. v. Redwood CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Jones-Hamilton Co., a California Corporation v. Beazer Materials & Services, Inc. Kop-Coat, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API