Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State Ex Rel. Burgstaller v. Franklin County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1948No. 31352Published

1ConcurrenceTurner, J.

While I concur in the ger curiam opinion in this case, I believe that the purpose and necessity of the law governing these cases should be dwelled upon more fully.

What the thirty relators urge us to do here is to exercise the legislative function in at least three instances, to wit:

1. To amend Section 4785-70, General Code, by reading out of that section the words, “but not more than five. ”

2. By disregarding the further provision of that section that the determination of the board of elections on a protest shall be final.

3. By enlarging the statutory definition of mandamus.

It is axiomatic…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. State Ex Rel. O'ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Koehler v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Williams v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Board of Education v. Village of WillardOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Foraker v. Perry Township Rural School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API